Application of the ERS/ATS Spirometry Standards and Race-Neutral Equations in the COPDGene Study.

RATIONALE: The European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the American Thoracic Society (ATS) recommend using z-scores, and the ATS has recommended using Global Lung Initiative (GLI)- "Global" race-neutral reference equations for spirometry interpretation. However, these recommendations have been variably implemented and the impact has not been widely assessed, both in clinical and research settings. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the ERS/ATS airflow obstruction severity classification. METHODS: In the COPDGene Study (n = 10,108), airflow obstruction has been defined as a forced expiratory volume in one second to forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) ratio <0.70, with spirometry severity graded from class 1 to 4 based on race-specific percent predicted (pp) FEV1 cut-points as recommended by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). We compared the GOLD approach, using NHANES III race-specific equations, to the application of GLI-Global equations using the ERS/ATS definition of airflow obstruction as FEV1/FVC ratio < lower limit of normal (LLN) and z-FEV1 cut-points of -1.645, -2.5, and -4 ("zGLI Global"). We tested the four-tier severity scheme for association with COPD outcomes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The lowest agreement between ERS/ATS with zGLI Global and the GOLD classification was observed in individuals with milder disease (56.9% and 42.5% in GOLD 1 and 2) and race was a major determinant of redistribution. After adjustment for relevant covariates, zGLI Global distinguished all-cause mortality risk between normal spirometry and the first grade of COPD (Hazard Ratio 1.23, 95% CI 1.04-1.44, p=0.014), and showed a linear increase in exacerbation rates with increasing disease severity, in comparison to GOLD. CONCLUSIONS: The zGLI Global severity classification outperformed GOLD in the discrimination of survival, exacerbations, and imaging characteristics.

Influence of Impaired Diffusing Capacity and Sleep-disordered Breathing on Nocturnal Hypoxemia and Health Outcomes in Men with and without HIV.

RATIONALE: Nocturnal hypoxemia is common in sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Although impaired diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) is associated with daytime hypoxemia, its influence on SDB-related nocturnal hypoxemia is not known. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the effects of DLCO impairment on SDB-related nocturnal hypoxemia and associated health outcomes. METHODS: Data from a multi-center cohort of men with and without HIV, with concomitant measures of DLCO and home-based polysomnography (N=544), were analyzed. Multivariable quantile regression models characterized associations between DLCO and several measures of SDB-related hypoxemia (e.g., total sleep time with oxygen saturation [SpO2]<90% [T90]). Structural equation models assessed associations between impaired DLCO and SDB-related hypoxemia measures with prevalent hypertension and type 2 diabetes. RESULTS: DLCO impairment (<80% predicted) was associated with sleep-related hypoxemia. Participants with severe SDB (apnea-hypopnea index≥30 events/hr) and impaired DLCO had a higher T90 (median difference: 15.0%; [95% CI: 10.3,19.7]) and average SDB-related desaturation (median difference: 1.0; [0.5, 1.5]), and lower nadir SpO2 (median difference: -8.2%; [-11.4, -4.9]) and average SpO2 during sleep (median difference: -1.1%; [-2.1, -0.01]), than those with severe SDB and preserved DLCO. A higher T90 was associated with higher adjusted odds of prevalent hypertension (OR 1.39; [1.14,1.70]) and type 2 diabetes (OR 1.25; [1.07,1.46]). CONCLUSIONS: DLCO impairment in severe SDB was associated with sleep-related hypoxemia, prevalent hypertension and type 2 diabetes. Assessment of SDB should be considered in those with impaired DLCO to guide testing and risk-stratification strategies.

Changes in Spirometry Interpretative Strategies: Implications for Classifying COPD and Predicting Exacerbations.

BACKGROUND: Recent guidelines for spirometry interpretation recommend both race-neutral reference equations and use of z score thresholds to define severity of airflow obstruction. RESEARCH QUESTION: How does the transition from race-specific to race-neutral equations impact severity classifications for patients with COPD when using % predicted vs z score thresholds, and do changes in severity correspond to clinical risk? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included Black and White patients with COPD and available spirometry from the Johns Hopkins Health System. Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) 2012 (race-specific) equations and GLI Global (race-neutral) equations were used to determine FEV1 % predicted and z score values. Patients were classified as having mild, moderate, or severe disease according to % predicted or z score thresholds. Associations between a change in severity classification from race-specific to race-neutral with COPD exacerbations and all-cause hospitalizations were evaluated using logistic regression. RESULTS: This cohort included 13,324 patients, of whom 9,232 patients (69.3%) were White (mean age, 65.7 years) and 4,092 patients (30.7%) were Black (mean age, 61.1 years). More Black than White patients showed a change in severity classification between approaches when using % predicted thresholds (20.2% vs 6.1%; P < .001), but not with z score thresholds (12.6% vs 12.3%; P = .68). An increased severity classification with a race-neutral approach was associated with increased risk of exacerbation when using z score thresholds (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.51-3.63), but not when using % predicted thresholds (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.61-1.93). A decreased severity classification with a race-neutral approach was associated with lower risk of exacerbation with both % predicted (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.28-0.87) and z score (OR 0.67; 95% CI, 0.50-0.90) thresholds. INTERPRETATION: The proportions of Black and White individuals reclassified were similar with z score thresholds, and changes in severity corresponded to clinical risk with z scores. These results support recent recommendations for use of race-neutral equations and z score thresholds for spirometry interpretation.

FEV1Q: a race-neutral approach to assessing lung function.

BACKGROUND: Forced expiratory volume in 1 s quotient (FEV1Q) is a simple approach to spirometry interpretation that compares measured lung function to a lower boundary. This study evaluated how well FEV1Q predicts survival compared with current interpretation methods and whether race impacts FEV1Q. METHODS: White and Black adults with complete spirometry and mortality data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III and the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database for lung transplant referrals were included. FEV1Q was calculated as FEV1 divided by 0.4 L for females or 0.5 L for males. Cumulative distributions of FEV1 were compared across races. Cox proportional hazards models tested mortality risk from FEV1Q adjusting for age, sex, height, smoking, income and among UNOS individuals, referral diagnosis. Harrell's C-statistics were compared between absolute FEV1, FEV1Q, FEV1/height2, FEV1 z-scores and FEV1 % predicted. Analyses were stratified by race. RESULTS: Among 7182 individuals from NHANES III and 7149 from UNOS, 1907 (27%) and 991 (14%), respectively, were Black. The lower boundary FEV1 values did not differ between Black and White individuals in either population (FEV1 first percentile difference ≤0.01 L; p>0.05). Decreasing FEV1Q was associated with increasing hazard ratio (HR) for mortality (NHANES III HR 1.33 (95% CI 1.28-1.39) and UNOS HR 1.18 (95% CI 1.12-1.23)). The associations were not confounded nor modified by race. Discriminative power was highest for FEV1Q compared with alternative FEV1 approaches in both Black and White individuals. CONCLUSIONS: FEV1Q is an intuitive and simple race-neutral approach to interpreting FEV1 that predicts survival better than current alternative methods.

Indoor Air Sources of Outdoor Air Pollution: Health Consequences, Policy, and Recommendations: An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report.

Indoor sources of air pollution worsen indoor and outdoor air quality. Thus, identifying and reducing indoor pollutant sources would decrease both indoor and outdoor air pollution, benefit public health, and help address the climate crisis. As outdoor sources come under regulatory control, unregulated indoor sources become a rising percentage of the problem. This American Thoracic Society workshop was convened in 2022 to evaluate this increasing proportion of indoor contributions to outdoor air quality. The workshop was conducted by physicians and scientists, including atmospheric and aerosol scientists, environmental engineers, toxicologists, epidemiologists, regulatory policy experts, and pediatric and adult pulmonologists. Presentations and discussion sessions were centered on 1) the generation and migration of pollutants from indoors to outdoors, 2) the sources and circumstances representing the greatest threat, and 3) effective remedies to reduce the health burden of indoor sources of air pollution. The scope of the workshop was residential and commercial sources of indoor air pollution in the United States. Topics included wood burning, natural gas, cooking, evaporative volatile organic compounds, source apportionment, and regulatory policy. The workshop concluded that indoor sources of air pollution are significant contributors to outdoor air quality and that source control and filtration are the most effective measures to reduce indoor contributions to outdoor air. Interventions should prioritize environmental justice: Households of lower socioeconomic status have higher concentrations of indoor air pollutants from both indoor and outdoor sources. We identify research priorities, potential health benefits, and mitigation actions to consider (e.g., switching from natural gas to electric stoves and transitioning to scent-free consumer products). The workshop committee emphasizes the benefits of combustion-free homes and businesses and recommends economic, legislative, and education strategies aimed at achieving this goal.

Diffusing Capacity as a Predictor of Hospitalizations in a Clinical Cohort of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Rationale: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) hospitalizations are a major burden on patients. Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DlCO) is a potential predictor that has not been studied in large cohorts. Objectives: This study used electronic health record data to evaluate whether clinically obtained DlCO predicts COPD hospitalizations. Methods: We performed time-to-event analyses of individuals with COPD and DlCO measurements from the Johns Hopkins COPD Precision Medicine Center of Excellence. Cox proportional hazard methods were used to model time from DlCO measurement to first COPD hospitalization and composite first hospitalization or death, adjusting for age, sex, race, body mass index, smoking status, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), history of prior COPD hospitalization, and comorbidities. To identify the utility of including DlCO in risk models, area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) values were calculated for models with and without DlCO. Results were externally validated in a separate analogous cohort. Results: Of 2,793 participants, 368 (13%) had a COPD hospitalization within 3 years. In adjusted analyses, for every 10% decrease in DlCO% predicted, risk of COPD hospitalization increased by 10% (hazard ratio, 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.2; P < 0.001). Similar associations were observed for COPD hospitalizations or death. The model including demographics, comorbidities, FEV1, DlCO, and prior COPD hospitalizations performed well, with an AUC of 0.85 and an AUC of 0.84 in an external validation cohort. Conclusions: Diffusing capacity is a strong predictor of COPD hospitalizations in a clinical cohort of individuals with COPD, independent of airflow obstruction and prior hospitalizations. These findings support incorporation of DlCO in risk assessment of patients with COPD.

Food Insecurity is Associated With COPD Morbidity and Perceived Stress.

Background: Low socioeconomic status (SES) has been associated with worse clinical outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Food insecurity is more common among individuals with low SES and has been associated with poor outcomes in other chronic illnesses, but its impact on COPD has not been studied. Methods: Former smokers with spirometry-confirmed COPD were recruited from low-income areas of Baltimore, Maryland, and followed for 9 months as part of a cohort study of diet and indoor air pollution. Food insecurity and respiratory outcomes, including COPD exacerbations and patient-reported outcomes, were assessed at regular intervals. The association between food insecurity and COPD outcomes was analyzed using generalized linear mixed models. Additional analyses examined the association of COPD morbidity with subdomains of food insecurity and the association of food insecurity with psychological well-being measures. Results: Ninety-nine participants had available data on food insecurity and COPD outcomes. A total of 26.3% of participants were food insecure at 1 or more times during the study. After adjusting for individual SES, neighborhood poverty, and low healthy food access, food insecurity was associated with a higher incidence rate of moderate and severe exacerbations and worse dyspnea, COPD health status, and respiratory-specific quality of life. Subdomains of food insecurity were independently associated with worse patient-reported outcomes. Food insecurity was additionally associated with higher perceived stress. Discussion: Among former smokers with COPD, food insecurity was associated with a higher incidence of exacerbations, worse patient-reported outcomes, and higher perceived stress. Subdomains of food insecurity were independently associated with worse patient-reported outcomes.

Early Evidence of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Obscured by Race-Specific Prediction Equations.

Rationale: The identification of early chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is essential to appropriately counsel patients regarding smoking cessation, provide symptomatic treatment, and eventually develop disease-modifying treatments. Disease severity in COPD is defined using race-specific spirometry equations. These may disadvantage non-White individuals in diagnosis and care. Objectives: Determine the impact of race-specific equations on African American (AA) versus non-Hispanic White individuals. Methods: Cross-sectional analyses of the COPDGene (Genetic Epidemiology of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) cohort were conducted, comparing non-Hispanic White (n = 6,766) and AA (n = 3,366) participants for COPD manifestations. Measurements and Main Results: Spirometric classifications using race-specific, multiethnic, and "race-reversed" prediction equations (NHANES [National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey] and Global Lung Function Initiative "Other" and "Global") were compared, as were respiratory symptoms, 6-minute-walk distance, computed tomography imaging, respiratory exacerbations, and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire. Application of different prediction equations to the cohort resulted in different classifications by stage, with NHANES and Global Lung Function Initiative race-specific equations being minimally different, but race-reversed equations moving AA participants to more severe stages and especially between the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage 0 and preserved ratio impaired spirometry groups. Classification using the established NHANES race-specific equations demonstrated that for each of GOLD stages 1-4, AA participants were younger, had fewer pack-years and more current smoking, but had more exacerbations, shorter 6-minute-walk distance, greater dyspnea, and worse BODE (body mass index, airway obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity) scores and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire scores. Differences were greatest in GOLD stages 1 and 2. Race-reversed equations reclassified 774 AA participants (43%) from GOLD stage 0 to preserved ratio impaired spirometry. Conclusions: Race-specific equations underestimated disease severity among AA participants. These effects were particularly evident in early disease and may result in late detection of COPD.

Indoor particulate matter concentrations and air cleaner intervention association with biomarkers in former smokers with COPD.

BACKGROUND: Indoor pollutants have been associated with worse clinical outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Elevated biomarkers are associated with ambient pollution exposure, however the association with indoor pollution remains unclear. METHODS: Former smokers with spirometry-confirmed COPD were randomized to portable air cleaner or placebo. Indoor particulate matter (PM2.5, PM10, and ultrafine particles [UFP; PM<0.1]) and biomarkers were measured longitudinally at pre-specified intervals and course PM fraction (PM10-2.5) was calculated. Biomarkers were categorized based on associations with biologic mechanisms: inflammation (white blood cell count, interleukin [IL]-6, IL-8, IL-1ß, tumor necrosis factor-α, interferon-γ, serum amyloid A), platelet activation (P-selectin, CD40 ligand [CD40L], 11-dehdydro-thromboxane-B2 [11dTxB2]), endothelial dysfunction (Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule [VCAM]-1, Intercellular Adhesion Molecule [ICAM]-1), and oxidative stress (thiobarbituric acid reactive substances [TBARS], 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine, 8-isoprostane). Associations between PM concentrations and each biomarker were analyzed using multivariable linear mixed models. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed to evaluate the air cleaner intervention on the biomarker levels longitudinally. RESULTS: Fifty-eight participants were randomized to each group. Finer PM was more strongly associated with higher IL-8 (mean difference per doubling: UFP 13.9% [p = 0.02], PM2.5 6.8% [p = 0.002], PM10-2.5 5.0% [p = 0.02]) while interferon-γ was associated with UFP and IL-1ß with PM10-2.5. UFP and PM2.5 were associated with elevated levels of the oxidative stress biomarkers TBARS and 8-isoprostane respectively. For platelet activation markers, UFP was associated with higher 11dTxB2 while PM2.5 was associated with higher P-selectin and CD40L. Pollutants were not associated with biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction. In intention-to-treat analysis there was no association of the air cleaner intervention with any of the biomarkers. DISCUSSION: Among former smokers with COPD, elevated levels of indoor air pollutants, particularly ultrafine particles (PM<0.1), were associated with elevated biomarkers of inflammation, platelet activation, and oxidative stress. However, an air cleaner intervention that reduced PM did not significantly reduce biomarker levels.

Towards a Race-Neutral System of Pulmonary Function Test Results Interpretation.

It has been observed widely that, on average, Black individuals in the United States have lower FVC than White individuals, which is thought to reflect a combination of genetic, environmental, and socioeconomic factors that are difficult to disentangle. Debate therefore persists even after the American Thoracic Society's 2023 guidelines recommending race-neutral pulmonary function test (PFT) result interpretation strategies. Advocates of race-based PFT results interpretation argue that it allows for more precise measurement and will minimize disease misclassification. In contrast, recent studies have shown that low lung function in Black patients has clinical consequences. Furthermore, the use of race-based algorithms in medicine in general is increasingly being questioned for its risk of perpetuating structural health care disparities. Given these concerns, we believe it is time to adopt a race-neutral approach, but note that more research is urgently needed to understand how race-neutral approaches impact PFT results interpretation, clinical decision-making, and patient outcomes. In this brief case-based discussion, we offer a few examples of how a race-neutral PFT results interpretation strategy will impact individuals from racial and ethnic minority groups at different scenarios and stages of life.

Decreased Cardiac Autonomic Function is Associated with Higher Exacerbation Risk and Symptom Burden in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Current measures of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) severity, including lung function, do not fully explain symptom burden, and there is a need to identify predictors of exacerbation risk and morbidity. Autonomic dysfunction may be implicated in both cardiovascular and respiratory morbidity in COPD and convey risk for exacerbations. Heart rate variability (HRV) is a marker of cardiac autonomic function that is predictive of cardiovascular health and has promise as a non-invasive COPD biomarker. The CLEAN AIR Heart study provided an opportunity to investigate the association between HRV and COPD morbidity among former smokers with moderate-severe COPD. Eighty-five participants, contributing 305 HRV measurements, underwent repeated clinical assessments over 4 study periods that included a 24-Holter monitoring assessment of HRV. HRV measures of interest were standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals, (SDNN) (overall HRV) and root-mean-square of successive differences (RMSSD) (parasympathetic function). Exacerbation risk was assessed using negative binomial models, and mixed-effects models analyzed associations between HRV and symptoms. Decreases in SDNN (incidence rate ratio [IRR]1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13 to1.74) and RMSSD (IRR 1.60; 95% CI 1.07 to 2.37) were associated with severe exacerbation risk. Decreases in SDNN were associated with higher St George's Respiratory Questionnaire scores, COPD Assessment Test scores, and chronic bronchitis symptoms. Findings demonstrate that HRV is associated with COPD symptom burden and exacerbation risk. HRV may represent an important biomarker with the potential to identify high-risk COPD populations.

Race-Specific Interpretation of Spirometry: Impact on the Lung Allocation Score.

Rationale: Interpretation of spirometry using race-specific reference equations may contribute to health disparities via underestimation of the degree of lung function impairment in Black patients. The use of race-specific equations may differentially affect patients with severe respiratory disease via the use of percentage predicted forced vital capacity (FVCpp) when included in the lung allocation score (LAS), the primary determinant of priority for lung transplantation. Objectives: To determine the impact of a race-specific versus a race-neutral approach to spirometry interpretation on the LAS among adults listed for lung transplantation in the United States. Methods: We developed a cohort from the United Network for Organ Sharing database including all White and Black adults listed for lung transplantation between January 7, 2009, and February 18, 2015. The LAS at listing was calculated for each patient under race-specific and race-neutral approaches, using the FVCpp generated from the Global Lung Function Initiative equation corresponding to each patient's race (race-specific) or from the Global Lung Function Initiative "other" (race-neutral) equation. Differences in LAS between approaches were compared by race, with positive values indicating a higher LAS under the race-neutral approach. Results: In this cohort of 8,982 patients, 90.3% were White and 9.7% were Black. The mean FVCpp was 4.4% higher versus 3.8% lower among White versus Black patients (P < 0.001) under a race-neutral compared with a race-specific approach. Compared with White patients, Black patients had a higher mean LAS under both a race-specific (41.9 vs. 43.9; P < 0.001) and a race-neutral (41.3 vs. 44.3; P < 0.001) approach. However, the mean difference in LAS under a race-neutral approach was -0.6 versus +0.6 for White versus Black patients (P < 0.001). Differences in LAS under a race-neutral approach were most pronounced for those in group B (pulmonary vascular disease) (-0.71 vs. +0.70; P < 0.001) and group D (restrictive lung disease) (-0.78 vs. +0.68; P < 0.001). Conclusions: A race-specific approach to spirometry interpretation has potential to adversely affect the care of Black patients with advanced respiratory disease. Compared with a race-neutral approach, a race-specific approach resulted in lower LASs for Black patients and higher LASs for White patients, which may have contributed to racially biased allocation of lung transplantation. The future use of race-specific equations must be carefully considered.

Exposures to Organophosphate Esters and Respiratory Morbidity among School-Aged Children with Asthma.

Organophosphate esters (OPEs) are an emerging class of chemicals used in a variety of consumer products as flame retardants, plasticizers, and additives. While prior epidemiologic studies suggest that OPEs may impact respiratory health, results remain inconclusive. We examined associations between urinary biomarkers of OPEs and symptoms of respiratory morbidity in a panel study of 147 predominantly Black school-aged children with asthma living in Baltimore City, Maryland. The study consisted of up to four seasonal, week-long, in-home visits where urine samples and self-reported asthma symptoms were collected on days 4 and 7 (nsamples = 438). We quantified concentrations of nine urinary OPE biomarkers: bis(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (BCEtp), bis(1-chloro-2-propyl) phosphate (BCPP), bis(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate (BDCIPP), di-n-butyl phosphate (DBuP), di-benzyl phosphate (DBzP), di-o-cresylphosphate (DOCP), di-p-cresylphosphate (DPCP), di-(2-propylheptyl) phthalate (DPHP), and 2,3,4,5-tetrabromo benzoic acid (TBBA). We estimated prevalence odds ratios (POR) of respiratory morbidity symptoms using logistic regression with generalized estimating equations to account for our repeated measure design. We assessed BDCIPP and DPHP as continuous (log2) concentrations and dichotomized exposure of BCEtP, DBuP, and DPCP (detect vs non-detect) based on their lower detection frequencies. We adjusted models for season, visit day, age, gender, caregiver education, health insurance type, exposure to household smoking, atopy, and PM2.5. Higher DPHP concentrations were significantly associated with odds of daytime symptoms (POR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.04-1.53; p = 0.02) where daytime symptoms consisted of trouble breathing due to asthma, reporting bother caused by asthma, and/or limitation in activities due to asthma. DBuP detection was associated with use of rescue medication on the day of sample collection (POR: 2.36; 95% CI: 1.05-5.29; p = 0.04). We also observed several consistent, albeit non-significant (p > 0.05), positive associations for BCEtP and DPCP and respiratory morbidity measures. This is the first study to evaluate the relationship between OPE biomarkers and respiratory morbidity symptoms in children with asthma, and findings suggest that further studies are warranted to confirm whether these associations are causal.

Use of the Spirometric "Fixed-Ratio" Underdiagnoses COPD in African-Americans in a Longitudinal Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: COPD diagnosis is tightly linked to the fixed-ratio spirometry criteria of FEV1/FVC < 0.7. African-Americans are less often diagnosed with COPD. OBJECTIVE: Compare COPD diagnosis by fixed-ratio with findings and outcomes by race. DESIGN: Genetic Epidemiology of COPD (COPDGene) (2007-present), cross-sectional comparing non-Hispanic white (NHW) and African-American (AA) participants for COPD diagnosis, manifestations, and outcomes. SETTING: Multicenter, longitudinal US cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Current or former smokers with ≥ 10-pack-year smoking history enrolled at 21 clinical centers including over-sampling of participants with known COPD and AA. Exclusions were pre-existing non-COPD lung disease, except for a history of asthma. MEASUREMENTS: Subject diagnosis by conventional criteria. Mortality, imaging, respiratory symptoms, function, and socioeconomic characteristics, including area deprivation index (ADI). Matched analysis (age, sex, and smoking status) of AA vs. NHW within participants without diagnosed COPD (GOLD 0; FEV1 ≥ 80% predicted and FEV1/FVC ≥ 0.7). RESULTS: Using the fixed ratio, 70% of AA (n = 3366) were classified as non-COPD, versus 49% of NHW (n = 6766). AA smokers were younger (55 vs. 62 years), more often current smoking (80% vs. 39%), with fewer pack-years but similar 12-year mortality. Density distribution plots for FEV1 and FVC raw spirometry values showed disproportionate reductions in FVC relative to FEV1 in AA that systematically led to higher ratios. The matched analysis demonstrated GOLD 0 AA had greater symptoms, worse DLCO, spirometry, BODE scores (1.03 vs 0.54, p < 0.0001), and greater deprivation than NHW. LIMITATIONS: Lack of an alternative diagnostic metric for comparison. CONCLUSIONS: The fixed-ratio spirometric criteria for COPD underdiagnosed potential COPD in AA participants when compared to broader diagnostic criteria. Disproportionate reductions in FVC relative to FEV1 leading to higher FEV1/FVC were identified in these participants and associated with deprivation. Broader diagnostic criteria for COPD are needed to identify the disease across all populations.